There’s nothing new about the New York Times demonstrating that it’s a garbage newspaper and that didn’t change this morning with their completely obnoxious headline about Daniel Penny getting acquitted:

“Jury acquits man who was choking ride on subway” – what in the hell?!?

What a pos headline. These people are evil. Daniel Penny was a hero for saving people on the subway and if Jordan Neely hadn’t been all drugged up, he’d probably still be alive today to apologize for his actions. 

The real headline should have read “Jury acquits hero who saved riders on subway and Alvin Bragg loses another case that should’ve never been brought.”

There's nothing new about the New York Times demonstrating that it's a garbage newspaper and that didn't change this morning with their completely obnoxious headline about Daniel Penny getting acquitted: Actual in…{ai:summary}Daniel Penny was acquitted by a jury for his actions on the subway, which some view as heroic. Critics argue that the New York Times' headline mischaracterizes the event, suggesting it downplays Penny's role in defending fellow riders. Many believe that if Jordan Neely had not been under the influence of drugs, the situation could have ended differently. The case has drawn significant attention, with calls for a more favorable portrayal of Penny's actions. #crime

GARBAGE: Here’s how the New York Times reported on Daniel Penny getting acquitted – The Right Scoop

Loading...