THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 2, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
TRS
The Right Scoop
4 Aug 2023


NextImg:Federal judge overseeing phony DOJ election case ruled against Trump EVERY TIME he was ever been before her

Judge Tanya Chutkan, the federal judge ‘randomly selected’ to oversee the DOJ’s new case against Trump regarding the 2020 election, has seen Trump and his administration before her bench many times. And in each of those cases, she ruled against Trump every time.

Robby Starbuck pointed this out on Twitter, saying “A follower of mine did some research they sent me on Judge Tanya Chutkan who’s been given the latest Trump indictment case. It turns out she’s presided over many cases involving Trump in recent years. She ruled against him in EVERY case they found.”

Loading a Tweet...

Below is the full tweet from Starbuck including all the links he posted to prove his point.

A follower of mine did some research they sent me on Judge Tanya Chutkan who’s been given the latest Trump indictment case. It turns out she’s presided over many cases involving Trump in recent years. She ruled against him in EVERY case they found. 10 of those cases can be found at the links below. This judge is clearly biased and makes a mockery of our justice system by not stepping aside. It’s clear that she’s a weapon being deployed by the Democrats. If she wasn’t then she’d recuse to avoid the appearance of bias in such a critical case.

A follower of mine did some research they sent me on Judge Tanya Chutkan who’s been given the latest Trump indictment case. It turns out she’s presided over many cases involving Trump in recent years. She ruled against him in EVERY case they found. 10 of those cases can be found at the links below. This judge is clearly biased and makes a mockery of our justice system by not stepping aside. It’s clear that she’s a weapon being deployed by the Democrats. If she wasn’t then she’d recuse to avoid the appearance of bias in such a critical case.

missoulacurrent.com/bears-ears-law

washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2019/

abcnews.go.com/US/judges-spli

nbcnews.com/politics/immig

disabilityscoop.com/2019/05/10/tru

voanews.com/a/usa_us-feder

nbcnews.com/politics/polit

yahoo.com/news/tanya-chu

whyy.org/articles/court

forbes.com/sites/joewalsh

Here’s a couple of disturbing highlights from the articles mentioned above. In the first case, Chutkan was the judge who made sure illegal immigrants had access to taxpayer funded abortion:

Loading a Tweet...

In the second, she said this during a the sentencing of a J6er who was only being charged with a misdemeanor regarding the Capitol riot:

“People gathered all over the country last year to protest the violent murder by the police of an unarmed man — some of those protests became violent,” Chutkan said. “But to compare the actions of people protesting mostly peacefully for civil rights to those of a violent mob seeking to overthrow the lawfully elected government is a false equivalency and ignores the very real danger that the Jan. 6 riot posed to the foundation of our democracy.”

She’s a leftist nutjob. There’s no way Trump gets a fair trial before her bench. If he doesn’t get his case moved, he might as well go ahead and put on handcuffs and report to the federal penitentiary. Because that’s how it’s going to end.