It’s being reported this morning that after over two hours of oral arguments, it appears a majority of the Supreme Court is likely to uphold a ban on TikTok.

They reportedly aren’t buying the argument that it violates the first amendment, but rather suggest it is about Congress regulating potential foreign control of the app.

Here’s more:

A majority of the Supreme Court appeared likely to uphold a controversial ban on TikTok over concerns about its ties to China, with justices lobbing pointed questions at lawyers for the social media app and a group of its content creators.

During more than two hours of oral arguments many of the justices appeared to view the sell-or-ban law approved by Congress in April not as one that primarily implicates the First Amendment but rather as an effort to regulate the potential foreign control of an app used by 170 million Americans.

The law is set to take effect on January 19 unless the high court steps in to block it temporarily. A decision on that question – the ban’s implementation date – could come quickly, long before the justices resolve any underlying questions about speech protections.

Two presidents – Donald Trump and Joe Biden – have both raised concerns in the past about both content manipulation on the platform and its data collection practices. TikTok argued those concerns were speculative and resisted any suggestion that the Chinese government had a role in picking the cat videos, recipes and news that millions of Americans view on the app.

I had a feeling that the Supreme Court would keep the law intact because it is a legitimate issue and it was passed by Congress and signed by the current occupant of the Oval Office.