It’s just breaking that Kamala Harris is refusing to agree to the Fox News debate. I think nearly everyone expected that. 

But she’s also trying to take charge of this debate process by suggesting Trump is a wild card:

Selina Wang is the same propagandist who did that piece for ABC News last night defending Tim Walz. 

But as far as Kamala goes, her campaign saying “future debates are contingent on Trump showing” is such bullcrap. Absolute and utter bullcrap. Trump is not scared to debate her, as she appears to be suggesting here. But she’s clearly scared of going on Fox News because she only wants Democrat news organizations to ask her questions. 

If I were Trump, I’d tell her its Fox News and ABC News or no debate. Trump goes in hostile environments all the time and – I’m not saying Fox News is hostile, but she should absolutely debate there. 

So will Trump fold or will he stick to his guns? Or does it even matter?

It's just breaking that Kamala Harris is refusing to agree to the Fox News debate. I think nearly everyone expected that. But she's also trying to take charge of this debate process…{ai:summary}<p>Kamala Harris backs out of the Fox News debate, claiming future debates hinge on Trump's attendance at ABC’s showdown. A strategy to control the narrative, but it reeks of fear. Trump’s ready to debate anywhere — a contrast that highlights her cautious approach.</p><p>Critics argue Harris's reluctance reveals her insecurities, while Trump thrives in contentious spaces. The stage is set; will Trump hold firm, or does it even matter in the grand game of political chess?  #politics</p>

BREAKING: Kamala refuses Fox News debate, tries to take charge on debates with stupid comment… – The Right Scoop

Loading...