The corrupt Fani Willis just lost in court again after being ordered to pay legal fees for Judicial Watch.

Willis has been ordered to cough up nearly $22k, which is the cost of the lawsuit by Judicial Watch “for communications Willis had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee.”

This comes after the court found that Willis was in default in the lawsuit:

Judicial Watch filed this lawsuit in March 2024 filed after Willis falsely denied having any records responsive to Judicial Watch’s earlier Georgia Open Records Act (ORA) request for communications with Special Counsel Jack Smiths office and/or the January 6 Committee (Judicial Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al. (No. 24-CV-002805)).

After finding Willis in default, the court ordered a court hearing on December 20, which resulted in the order yesterday, finding Willis liable for fees and expenses that “shall be paid within two weeks of the entry of this Order.”

Here’s more:

 
According to Judicial Watch, Fani Willis has finally admitted she does have the documents in question but won’t release them citing legal exemptions. JW has asked the court to appoint a special master:

]

In early December, Willis finally admitted to having records showing communications with the January 6 Committee but refused to release all but one document in response to the court order that found her in default. She cited a series of legal exemptions to justify the withholding of communications with the January 6 Committee. The only document she did release is one already public letter to January 6 Committee Chairman Benny Thompson (D-MS).

Judicial Watch subsequently filed a motion in asking the court to appoint a special master to oversee District Attorney Fani Willis’ search for records in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit and that the court to conduct an in camera (private) inspection of any records found.

Judicial Watch stated in its motion that Willis’ response to the order “makes no showing that the search was diligent. Based on her previous searches in this matter, it probably was not diligent. Likewise, she provided no list or even a general description regarding any responsive records she has elected to withhold. Without a list or description, it is impossible to evaluate what, if any, exemptions or exceptions are applicable, as she now contends.”

Fani Willis’s response to Judicial Watch’s request for a special master is due January 16, 2025.