THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jul 25, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic


NextImg:BIG BREAKING: Ninth Circuit strikes down California law in Second Amendment case – The Right Scoop

It’s just being reported that a California law, which mandated that people buying ammunition must pass a background check, has been struck down by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. They ruled the law to be unconstitutional.

Here’s the news via the New York Times:

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit struck down a California law on Thursday that required buyers of ammunition to pass a background check, deeming the law unconstitutional.

The requirement took effect in July 2019 after voters approved a ballot initiative on the issue. It mandates that purchasers of ammunition pass a background check similar to those applied to buyers of handguns. The check is intended to block purchases by people with criminal records, or who are under restraining orders, or who have been determined by a court to pose a danger because of mental illness.

The requirement had already been halted and reinstated as litigation over the law has wound its way through the federal courts. A district court judge ruled in January 2024 that the law was unconstitutional, but a motions panel of the appeals court agreed to stay that decision shortly thereafter while the state of California appealed.

In its 2-1 decision on Thursday, the Ninth Circuit panel found that the law violated the Second Amendment, which protects gun rights.

“By subjecting Californians to background checks for all ammunition purchases, California’s ammunition background check regime infringes on the fundamental right to keep and bear arms,” the two-judge majority wrote in its opinion.

This is a major Second Amendment win and hopefully it will stick. I don’t yet know who the judges are but I’ll update with more as soon as I get it.

UPDATE: The vote was 2-1, with a George W. Bush appointee and a Trump appointee voting to strike down the law and another George W. Bush appointee dissenting.