THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 5, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic


NextImg:Too White to Fight?

Ackworth, UK

Ackworth, UK

Source: Bigstock

I didn’t sense much enthusiasm for the formal 80th-anniversary celebrations of VE Day across Britain last week, at least not amongst the young. How to combat this alarming apathy? Over in America, Donald Trump has just tried rebranding it with the new U.S.-centric name of “Victory Day for World War Two” on the grounds that “We won both [World Wars], nobody was close to us in terms of strength, bravery, or military brilliance, but we never celebrate anything.”

Far more youth-friendly might be for the U.K. government to merge VE Day with D-Day as a wholly new event called VD-Day, in which teenagers gather at open-air street parties to drink amphetamine-laced tea and patriotically gift one another chlamydia beneath red-white-and-blue bunting to an invigorating soundtrack of Glenn Miller mounting Vera Lynn.

Yet that in itself might prove too “triggering” for some Gen Zers. Even the famous photo of the U.S. Navy sailor grabbing a passing nurse and kissing her in Times Square on V-J Day has now been condemned as tantamount to an act of public mouth rape by certain straitlaced young radical feminists; or “little more than the documentation of a very public sexual assault, and not something to be celebrated.” Just wait until they hear about how the troops of the Red Army celebrated “freeing” Berlin back in ’45.

In 2019, a statue depicting the “nonconsensual” kiss was spray-painted with the hashtag #MeToo, whilst last year the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs went so far as to briefly ban all public display of the supposedly “pornographic” image at V-J Day events in order to “maintain a safe, respectful, and trauma-informed environment.” What kind of toytown wars do the DVA think its own veterans must have fought in, for them to have been “safe, respectful, and trauma-informed” occasions? Hardly sounds like My Lai or Fallujah, does it?

“What do the RAF’s actions say about the newfound status of white British people as apparent enemy aliens in their own homeland?”

Worse were the actions of the Dacorum Borough Council in the English county of Hertfordshire, who announced they were canceling (before later canceling the cancellation, following a public backlash) all VE Day parades this year, as being far too “elitist.” After all, not everybody in the local community (e.g., the Muslims) might have wanted to celebrate the victory of the hated imperialist British Army over the gallant Nazi Jew-killers, might they? Not everybody locally might have wanted to celebrate Ramadan recently, either, though, but the Borough Council didn’t dare try canceling that.

Sunni’s Shia Cheek
And why should they, when it was British Muslims who won WWII in the first place? An old 1970s joke from anti-immigration British comedian Bernard Manning once asked, “Where were all the Pakis on D-Day?” Almost the very same question was asked by writer Sunny Singh following the release of Christopher Nolan’s 2017 war movie Dunkirk, about the mass evacuation of British troops from the beaches of northern France in 1940. According to Singh, this withdrawal would not have been possible without the aid of the non-white heroes of the Royal Indian Army Services Corps, who were scandalously not depicted in the movie.

Sunni is indeed correct that it was not only white Caucasians who fought on the Allied side during WWII. There were also all those thousands of Goums Marocains, French colonial troops from Muslim Morocco who helped quell the Axis-allied Italians following German defeat at the Battle of Monte Cassino—by bravely marching into all the newly liberated towns and raping all their women. And children. And old men. And priests. About 12,000 of them, in fact. Here’s one typical account of the actions of the kind brown “liberators”:

In Esperia, 700 women were raped out of a population of 2,500 inhabitants…. Even the parish priest, Don Alberto Terrilli, in an attempt to defend two girls, was tied to a tree and raped for a whole night. He died two days later from internal lacerations…. In Pico, a girl was crucified with her sister…. [Girls] and old women were raped; the men who reacted were sodomized, shot dead, emasculated or impaled alive.

I thought the evil white supremacist Nazis were meant to have been the only known war criminals in WWII. A film called Marocchinate (“Moroccan Deeds,” as the atrocities became known) sounds like an excellent war movie for Christopher Nolan to make as a follow-up to Dunkirk, to take Sunni Singh’s reasonable ethnic concerns into account. Except, of course, this kind of “equal representation” up there on screen isn’t quite what she meant, was it? According to Sunni, complaining in The Guardian:

The stories that we share among ourselves give us the vision of our individual and collective identities. When those stories consistently…erase the presence of those who are still considered “other” and less-than-equal, these narratives also decide who is seen as “us” as opposed to “them.” Does this removal of those deemed “foreign” and “other” from narratives of the past express a discomfort with the same people in the present? More chillingly, does it also contain a wish to excise the same people from a utopian, national future?

Well, if it does, the marching boot is now very much on the other foot. By 2022, Britain’s Royal Air Force (RAF) was caught sending out an email to units asking for a fighter pilot to volunteer to be the RAF’s public face at promotional events for the new Hollywood Top Gun: Maverick movie, but one “who is preferably not white male.” The RAF further said they didn’t want any “shy guys” to apply, either, which is also highly discriminatory against the main race of enemies from Super Mario Bros. 2.

If “these narratives also decide who is seen as ‘us’ as opposed to ‘them,’” as Sunni Singh observed about Dunkirk, then what do the RAF’s actions here say about the newfound status of white British people as apparent enemy aliens in their own homeland?

Non-White Flight
It’s no wonder the British Armed Forces are having such trouble recruiting at the moment; the main traditional target employees, namely working-class young white British lads who enjoy shooting foreigners on their holidays, are literally being told they’re not wanted by recruitment sergeants, at least not when it comes to the plum assignments like being parachuted in to meet Tom Cruise at a London movie premiere. When it comes to being parachuted in to meet armed jihadis in the Middle East, however, the top brass are more than happy to deploy them to do things like that.

The problem is, even though about twelve of them single-handedly saved countless billions of inferior Anglos from immediate Nazi slaughter at Dunkirk (at least in Sunni Singh’s telling), these days non-whites in Britain just aren’t all that eager to sign up to lay down their lives for their country—possibly because Britain isn’t truly their country at all, when it really comes down to it.

The U.K. military recently blew £8m on a failed diversity drive aimed at increasing the numbers of blacks, Muslims, women, and even the disabled (admittedly, Douglas Bader managed to do okay on that score) into its ranks. The end result? That by the time of the ISIS rebellion, there were twice as many “British” Muslims fighting for the terrorists than there were in the ranks of HM Forces.

Meanwhile, following a secret illegal 2023 attempt by the RAF to exclude white male candidates from becoming pilots in favor of letting blacks, browns, and women apply instead, even though blacks, browns, and women overwhelmingly do not want to be RAF pilots, a predictable result ensued—a 30 percent shortage of pilots of any kind.

The RAF: Racist As Fuck, Recruiting All Foreigners.

Tanks for Nothing
And when today’s ethnic minorities do successfully sign up to fight for Oliver’s Army (a song Elvis Costello refuses to even sing anymore, as he now realizes it is profoundly “racist”), they don’t exactly always act like deserving future recipients of the Victoria Cross.

One pseudo-British soldier, Daniel Khalife, was found guilty of abusing his position to spy for Iran, attempting to feed Tehran classified military secrets, allegedly including the names of special forces members. Another recent traitor, Cpl. Tarj Sevier, abused his position to steal £150,000 worth of military equipment, much of potential use to terrorists, before selling it all off on eBay, because he felt he had been “unfairly treated at work.” So were those white wannabe RAF pilots, but they didn’t steal a Harrier jump jet, then try to flog it to the Real IRA down the nearest pub.

My favorite non-white recruit was Abdoulie Bojang, a Gambian who sued the U.K. Ministry of Defence in 2016 after it “failed to take into account his ethnicity” when deploying him for winter training exercises in the snowy wastes of Canada. Because blacks make easy targets for snipers against a white background? No, because it was so cold there, it made his hands change color. How did he notice? To be fair, being a Gambian living in Britain, Brigadier Bojangles was a clear expert in successfully invading other people’s countries after performing a possible amphibious landing on their beaches, meaning his recruitment may have initially made some sense.

However, it subsequently turned out that, according to his lawyers, non-whites “are 30 times more likely to contract” injuries like frostbite than whiteys are, affecting their extremities so badly that “their manual dexterity is reduced.” The consequent lack of masturbatory capacity may help explain the present-day overrepresentation of black Africans in U.K. rape-rate league tables.

Doesn’t this mean that, far from the recruitment of ethnic minorities being yet another instance of how “diversity makes us stronger,” it is by contrast an outstanding example of such methods actually making us weaker? Britain will, under such circumstances, inevitably come to possess a racially two-tier military, where, if ever required to go and fight Putin in the frozen Baltic, all non-white troops will be given medical leave to remain in Leicester Square attending glitzy Hollywood premieres, whilst poor Caucasian Tommy Atkins is sent off to eat lead with NATO in Finland, Sweden, and Latvia.

Were only dark-hued U.K. soldiers sent off to intervene in Sierra Leone and Syria in case all the milky-white ginger ones with freckles got skin cancer from the harsh Afro-Arabian sun?

Pyrrhic Victory
Now that war with Russia seems a possibility, at least in the East, European governments are panicking that their long-term disparagement of necessary self-preservatory concepts like patriotism, courage, self-sacrifice, and so-called “toxic masculinity” (a quality highly necessary in a soldier, one may have thought) has bred a pathetic bender milksop generation, wholly indifferent to things like VE Day, who show no inclination to fight at all.

In France, only 48 percent of 18- to 30-year-olds recently polled said they would be willing to sign up to the army if Gaul went to war, as opposed to 40 percent who said they wouldn’t. But, even worse, if they did don uniforms, only 14 percent of volunteers would then be willing to actually fight in it! Admittedly, running away from their enemy is the traditional role of the French military in times of conflict, but across the whole E.U. the average proportion of those willing to take up arms to defend their motherland in the first place is a paltry 32 percent.

In Britain, only 11 percent of Gen Z now say they would be willing to shoot Russkies or towelheads for the King if and when the balloon goes up; the main reason being that 50 percent of them think the country is racist. And they’re right, too, it is racist—against white people like many of the pubescent peaceniks themselves are! If they don’t believe me, they should try joining the RAF.

With all this in mind, I don’t think I’d be willing to fight for my country today either. After all, its leaders already appear to have declared war on people like me, sotto voce.

Victory in Europe Day…what would defeat have looked like, I am sometimes led to wonder.