<a href="https://afp-50216-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f/episodes/33dd5636-5719-43ad-889a-79aae547b94f/audio/128/default.mp3?awCollectionId=c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f&amp;awEpisodeId=33dd5636-5719-43ad-889a-79aae547b94f" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

If the claim in the title is true, why do both parties resist this issue? Why is robust new housing supply so hard for the right and the left to claim as their issue, when doing so would be so wildly popular politically, and is the right thing to do?

<a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/06/the-yimby-movement-is-for-conservatives-too/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The YIMBY Movement Is for Conservatives, Too</a><br>
<a href="https://yimbyaction.org/get-involved/abundant-housing-abundant-opportunities/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Abundant Housing Creates Abundant Opportunities</a>

If the claim in the title is true, why do both parties resist this issue?{ai:summary}<p>Both political parties struggle to embrace the housing supply issue, despite its potential popularity and positive impact. The YIMBY (Yes In My Backyard) movement argues that increasing housing availability benefits everyone, including conservatives, by creating more opportunities.</p><p>The resistance from both sides may stem from entrenched interests and ideological divides, making it difficult to unite around a solution that could address the housing crisis effectively. #society</p>

YIMBYism Is the Lowest Hanging Bipartisan Economic Fruit Imaginable

Loading...