<a href="https://afp-50216-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/1d82d5f4-ce3c-4643-a483-02229a6dd71e/episodes/ac2f3ac6-5297-4279-833d-82a575499ec3/audio/128/default.mp3?awCollectionId=1d82d5f4-ce3c-4643-a483-02229a6dd71e&amp;awEpisodeId=ac2f3ac6-5297-4279-833d-82a575499ec3" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

On episode 80 of <em>The</em> <em>Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast</em>, Charles talks to Molly Nixon, a separation of powers attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, about whether the delegation of the tariff power is constitutional. Why do we accept Congress giving this away when we wouldn’t accept Congress giving away the authority to set tax rates? When did this start? What are the main laws that Congress has written that achieve it? Can this be reversed? What would it take for Congress to take back control? Can the Supreme Court help?

The dial-up tone in the introduction was recorded <a href="https://freesound.org/people/lintphishx/sounds/65786/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">by lintphishx</a> and is used under a CC 3.0 License.

Charles talks to Molly Nixon, a separation of powers attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, about whether the delegation of the tariff power is constitutional.{ai:summary}<p>In episode 80 of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast, host Charles discusses the constitutionality of Congress delegating tariff power with attorney Molly Nixon. They explore the historical context, key legislation, and the feasibility of Congress reclaiming this authority, as well as the potential role of the Supreme Court.</p><p>The conversation raises questions about the implications of Congress relinquishing such powers, comparing it to the non-acceptance of giving away tax-setting authority. #politics</p>

The Tariff Sheriff

Loading...