THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Aug 13, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Jim Geraghty


NextImg:The Corner: The Upside to Much Higher Tariffs: A Somewhat Lower Deficit

A new analysis by Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget gives the Trump administration’s tariff regime credit where it’s due.

Raise your hand if you expected President Trump’s sweeping new tariff regime to get a relatively positive assessment from . . . the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

The CRFB is one of those lonely voices in Washington reminding American policymakers and the public that the country can’t just borrow and spend forever, a message of responsibility and long-term thinking that almost everyone in the nation’s capital hates and largely ignores.

A new analysis by CRFB gives the Trump administration’s tariff regime credit where it’s due — it’s bringing in a ton of money, which should make the annual deficit numbers better this year and in future years — presuming these tariffs stick around:

The group adds, “expect tariff revenue to grow further and ultimately rise to $40 to $50 billion per month (over 1.5 percent of GDP), before declining some as supply chains adjust.”

The think-tank emphasizes, “Our estimates are very rough and intended to reflect the general magnitude of the policies rather than precise scores, given the complexity of the tariffs and their impacts.” As you may have noticed, the tariff rates have changed quickly during Trump’s half-year or so in office.

The U.S. government is raking in a lot more revenue than it was projected to before Trump’s far-reaching tariff regime started. CRFB continues:

To put the tariffs in context, they are larger than what would be collected from a new 1 percent payroll tax, a $25 carbon tax, an elimination of Medicare Advantage overpayments, or a 17 percent reduction in military personnel. They are somewhat smaller than what would be collected from a 5 percent broad Value-Added Tax (VAT) or reversing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).”

Another way of thinking about it is that President Trump has figured out how to unilaterally impose tens of billions of dollars in new taxes on American consumers. If you hate taxes — and who doesn’t? — then this is a bad economic development on many levels.

But if you hate ever-higher deficits and the mounting national debt . . . well, this might be a silver lining to a dark cloud. Assuming the administration and GOP-controlled Congress don’t find some new way to spend the money as fast as it comes in, like Missouri GOP Senator Josh Hawley’s idea of tax rebate checks to balance out the higher prices created by the tariffs.