THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 3, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
National Review
National Review
26 Sep 2024
Jim Geraghty


NextImg:The Corner: The Unconvincing Arguments About the Dueling Averages of RealClearPolitics and 538

Despite strong opinions about both, the RealClearPolitics average and the FiveThirtyEight average barely differ, rarely more than by one percentage point.

Every now and then I’ll run across some reader who objects to my discussion of polls, contending that I shouldn’t cite the FiveThirtyEight average because it’s too friendly to Kamala Harris, or I shouldn’t cite the RealClearPolitics average because it’s too friendly to Donald Trump.

(I also hear objections to citing FiveThirtyEight because of “Nate Silver.” Nate Silver left FiveThirtyEight back in spring 2023. Silver now runs his own site, the Silver Bulletin. Try to keep up, man.)

FiveThirtyEight and RealClearPolitics do choose to include and reject different pollsters when putting together their averages. FiveThirtyEight doesn’t include surveys from Rasmussen Reports anymore. (Note that despite the firm’s name, founder Scott Rasmussen isn’t running the shop anymore, and he’s now conducting surveys for Napolitan News.)

But those decisions don’t add up to much of a difference, because both averages are including most of the same polls.

Here’s how they compare, as of Thursday morning:

National head-to-head average: The RealClearPolitics average has Harris ahead by 2 percentage points, FiveThirtyEight average has Harris ahead by 2.7 percentage points.

(It doesn’t appear there’s much reason to worry about whether a national poll includes Jill Stein, Chase Oliver, or Cornel West or not; RealClearPolitics has Harris ahead by 2.1 percentage points with the minor candidates included.)

Arizona: The RealClearPolitics average has Trump ahead by 1.6 percentage points; FiveThirtyEight has Trump ahead by 1.1 percentage points.

Georgia: The RealClearPolitics average has Trump ahead by 2.2 percentage points. The FiveThirtyEight average has Trump ahead by 1.1 percentage points.

Michigan: The RealClearPolitics average has Harris ahead by 1.8 percentage points. The FiveThirtyEight average has Harris ahead by 2.5 percentage points.

Nevada: The RealClearPolitics average has Harris ahead by .4, or four tenths of a percentage point. The FiveThirtyEight average has Harris ahead by .7, or seven tenths of a percentage point.

North Carolina: The RealClearPolitics average has Trump ahead by .6, or sixth tenths of a  percentage point. The FiveThirtyEight average has Trump ahead by .3. or three tenths of a percentage point.

Pennsylvania: The RealClearPolitics average has Harris ahead by .6 or six tenths of a percentage point. The FiveThirtyEight average has Harris ahead by 1.3 percentage points.

Wisconsin: The RealClearPolitics average has Harris  ahead by .7 or seven-tenths of a percentage point. The FiveThirtyEight average has Harris ahead by 2.2 percentage points.

Is RealClearPolitics average showing better results for Trump? Yeah, but usually by less than a percentage point, and never by more than 1.5 percentage points, as in Wisconsin.

You’ll notice that the largest lead for either candidate in either average is 2.2 percentage points, for Trump in Georgia, and Harris in Wisconsin. That’s well within the margin of error for all or almost all of the polls conducted, and thus my conclusion is what I’ve been saying in every interview for the past few weeks – it’s a jump ball race, and right now either candidate could win any of these seven swing states.

Saying that no swing state is out of reach for either candidate generates a seemingly endless chorus of “nuh-uhh!”responses in my social media feeds, and sometimes an insistence that a lead by about 2 percentage points in polling averages in late September is a sign that a candidate is “down well past the point of any sort of reasonable shot at winning.” Right, right. Every lead for your preferred candidate is insurmountable and ironclad, and every lead for the candidate you don’t like is about to crumble like a sandcastle when the tide is rolling in.

These seven states are very close. Right now it looks like Trump has a small lead or advantage in the sun belt states (Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina), Harris has a small lead or advantage in the “Blue Wall” states (Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin), and Nevada is anybody’s guess.

Not every disappointing polling result is evidence of a sinister conspiracy to screw your guy.