THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 20, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
National Review
National Review
3 Jan 2024
Jay Nordlinger


NextImg:The Corner: How to Party, Etc.

In Impromptus today, I start with a couple of dictatorships — China’s and Cuba’s. Then I touch on U.S. politics. Eventually, I have football, a movie, some music, some language — the usual. I end with a few photos of rural South Carolina. To try out this grab bag, go here.

Last week, I had some thoughts on the tribalist mind. A reader writes,

Hi, Jay,

I enjoyed today’s column. Made me think about my own reactions to gaffes/flubs/etc.

I’m no different from most people. I yuk it up when a Democrat steps in it, verbally, and tend to shrug it off when a Republican does the same. But over the past five to ten years, I have also stopped and thought about how many flubs I would get caught making if a horde of reporters recorded my every word. I’d probably look as foolish as these pols.

Luckily, the only ones who care what I say are my family, friends, and work colleagues. So I try to extend some grace to those in the public eye.

What was the cause of the Civil War? This question has been in the news, all these years — about 160 — later. I had a post on the subject, here. A reader writes to say, “My favorite Civil War historian, James McPherson, summarizes it very well.” Yeah? Yeah. Where? Here.

In English, you can make a verb out of anything. It is one of the glories of our language, as I remarked in a recent post. A reader writes,

Jay,

In the cartoon strip Calvin and Hobbes, Calvin enjoys creative language. In a final frame, he tells Hobbes, “Verbing weirds language.” Bill Watterson is a genius.

Another language note? I was griping, as I have so many times, about the replacement of the word “foreign” by “international.” Those words really mean different things, and we need both of those meanings. A friend writes,

Jay,

In the 1970s at the Infantry School, foreigners were “Allied” students. By the 1990s, that designation had changed to “International.” More accurate, yet somehow ominous . . .

In today’s column, I note Christmas messages from two politicians: Donald Trump and Mitt Romney. Very different men, very different messages. Here is Romney’s:

Loading a Tweet...

A reader writes, “But where are their guns?” (Well, you know: RINOs.)

In recent weeks, I have had columns and posts on “identity” and “identity politics” — segregation, integration, re-segregation, etc. A reader writes,

Jay,

A thought on re-segregation.

Many years ago (okay, the 1980s), my father used to take me to Savannah for what he described as “the second-largest St. Patrick’s Day celebration in the world, after Boston’s.” He was a part-time lobbyist for an insurance company and St. Patrick’s Day was very popular with Georgia politicos of all stripes.

Looking back, this strikes me as a good model: Have a party honoring one group or another, but invite everyone. Doesn’t that sound American?

My thanks to one and all.