Well, at least one brave one.

As you’ve likely heard by now, after shamefully limited debate, the British House of Commons voted on Tuesday night to decriminalize abortion through birth.

So, infanticide is fine, was the vote, it is fair to say.

While some media coverage tried to gloss over the grave milestone by dismissing the existing law as a Victorian rule that, of course, needed updating, a feminist came to the rescue of humanity.

The Telegraph noticed what Kathleen Stock, a philosophy professor who previously lost her job at the University of Sussex for politically incorrect views on transgender matters, said:

“Late-term abortions kill babies,” she said. “Viable babies.”

Writing on X, formerly Twitter, she added: “There is no good case for full decriminalisation as voted for today. And there is no genuine political will for it either, because most people haven’t been slowly boiled in a vat of hyper-liberal feminism and progressive technocracy like overheating frogs, until they can’t tell which way is up.”

She said:

All this will do is further undermine the legitimacy of feminism generally (by association, even if some feminists are actually against it) and also undermine public trust in lawmakers. (How could this have been decided so quickly without any proper consultation or discussion of a wide range of views? Why wasn’t it in the manifesto, if it is so important?)

More from Stock here:

The extremes to which defenders/expanders of abortion have gone/are going should force more reasonable people of goodwill of differing views on even abortion to work together for the betterment of humanity, starting, perhaps, with the most obviously vulnerable human life. A baby at birth certainly should qualify, for what should be a basic starting place, if we want to consider, I don’t know, saving civilization.