On episode 27 of <a href="https://podcast.charlescwcooke.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast</em></a>, I chatted with Toby Young about the state of free speech in the United Kingdom. We talked about whether Britain or the United States is more culturally censorious, whether Britain should adopt an equivalent of the First Amendment, why Scotland has such terrible laws, and how it can possibly be legal for the police to place “non-crimes” on Brits’ criminal records.

Subscribe <a href="https://podcast.charlescwcooke.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>, or I’ll cancel you.

On episode 27 of the Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast, Charles talks to Toby Young, of the Free Speech Union, about the state of free speech in the United Kingdom.{ai:summary}<p>In episode 27 of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast, I had a good ol' chat with Toby Young about the state of free speech in the United Kingdom. We pondered about who's more censorious - the Brits or the Yanks, and whether the UK needs their own version of the First Amendment. We also had a good laugh about Scotland's terrible laws and were utterly perplexed by the police's ability to crime people for non-crimes. Y'all better subscribe to the podcast quick, or I'll have to slap you with a cancelation. </p><p>Yours truly, Mark Twain</p>

The Corner: ‘Can I Say That?’

Loading...