THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 24, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
National Review
National Review
17 Apr 2024
Luther Ray Abel


NextImg:The Corner: Auto Ban: German Minister Threatens the End of Weekend Driving

Who knew Germans could be controversial (asks the man named Luther)?

The “comprehensive and indefinite driving bans on Saturdays and Sundays” threatened last week by Germany’s transport minister Volker Wissing had the desired effect, with Germany’s left-wing ruling coalition agreeing to a moderating climate-protection law. As one would expect, the far-left Greens were livid, as were their allies in the climate-advocacy space. “Wissing has wasted two years blocking every climate protection measure in road traffic — now he is coming up with horror scenarios so that he won’t have to do anything in the future either,” said Greenpeace’s Clara Thompson.

Šejla Ahmatović explains the debate for Politico:

The planned amendment to the emissions-reduction law allows climate goals to be reviewed for compliance by looking at all sectors together instead of individually. If the overall target is missed two years in a row, then the federal government is to decide in which sector and with which measures the permitted total amount of carbon dioxide emissions is to be achieved by 2030.

If the planned reforms are not passed through parliament by July 15, Wissing warned, the Ministry for Digital and Transport would be obliged to submit an “immediate action program that ensures compliance with the annual emission levels of the transport sector” until 2030 — which would include a driving ban on weekends.

In short, the new arrangement will gauge the net effect on climate across all sectors. As long as the big number goes down, there’d be no need to punish a specific industry or category for coming up short. The Germans, dour and thrifty as they may be, will not suffer two things: middling bread or limits on their ability to go very quickly. The public rallied behind Wissing to the extent that it was made clear to the political class that they had no intent of giving up their automobiles to meet the old legislation’s goals for transportation emissions. The new measure passed, and Germans may continue to motor from Ikea to Aldi Nord (or Süd) and never Netto.

What one can take away from this episode is that environmentalists care less about emissions reductions and more about punishing sectors they despise, in this case, automobiles and specifically personal automobiles. Germany’s emissions are down 10.1 percent in a year (remarkable), yet the Greens can do nothing but bemoan the German public’s ability to convey itself as it wishes (already paying out the nose for petrol).

Second, the Germans are fed up with the green push. While their emissions were down that 10 percent, the country suffered a terrible economic downturn, with energy prices and inflation hamstringing the country’s many heavy industries (metal and chemical) that depend on energy-intensive processes to produce their offerings. To the voters, there’s a clear connection between life getting worse and reductions in emissions.

It’s almost as if voters like the sound of bassackwards environmentalism up until the second it costs them. Climate activists should be treated the same way one does a Kirby vacuum salesman, with a polite wave and a “no, thank you.” A lot of money for a bit of suck. Certainly, never elect either cohort into government, or we’ll all be Porsche-less and drowning in vacuum attachments.