<a href="https://afp-50216-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f/episodes/0e4dda1c-e252-45c0-9e11-d5242fd50e8f/audio/128/default.mp3?awCollectionId=c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f&amp;awEpisodeId=0e4dda1c-e252-45c0-9e11-d5242fd50e8f" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

With the RFK confirmation hearings in the news, could it be that “health and human services” is not just a story about vaccines, snack foods, and the controversy around Robert Kennedy, but is actually an economic story, with a lesson for us all about the reason people use words like “big pharma” and “big business”?

Is the controversy around Robert Kennedy actually an economic lesson for us all about the reason people use words like ‘big pharma’ and ‘big business’?{ai:summary}<p>The RFK confirmation hearings highlight the intersection of health policy and economic interests, suggesting that discussions around "big pharma" and "big business" reflect broader concerns about the influence of corporate entities on public health. This situation underscores the need for transparency in health-related governance.</p><p>The implications of these hearings may extend beyond vaccines and nutrition, prompting a reevaluation of how economic factors shape health policy. Understanding this relationship could inform public discourse and policy decisions moving forward. #health</p>

RFK, Big Pharma, and a Free & Virtuous Society

Loading...