<a href="https://afp-50216-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f/episodes/4fbf7ef7-4af3-482c-9689-5ece113da377/audio/128/default.mp3?awCollectionId=c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f&amp;awEpisodeId=4fbf7ef7-4af3-482c-9689-5ece113da377" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

David wants the CFPB dismantled, and he thinks Russ Vought’s philosophy at OMB about deregulation is the right one. But did Vought use a really bad example of “weaponization” this weekend, and are some bad actors bad examples for good deregulation? David unpacks this dilemma of freedom and virtuousness in a quick, needed diatribe.

David wants the CFPB dismantled, and he thinks Russ Vought’s philosophy at OMB about deregulation is the right one.{ai:summary}<p>David advocates for dismantling the CFPB and supports Russ Vought's deregulation philosophy at OMB. However, he questions whether Vought's recent example of "weaponization" is appropriate and discusses the implications of bad actors in the context of good deregulation. </p><p>#politics</p>

Good Things and Bad Examples

Loading...