<a href="https://afp-50216-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f/episodes/a096e7d4-6877-4fb6-8f26-5654f3ddeda4/audio/128/default.mp3?awCollectionId=c0b27f89-5d54-45f2-b33f-6f6be80b222f&amp;awEpisodeId=a096e7d4-6877-4fb6-8f26-5654f3ddeda4" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

David does a deep analysis of the arguments for blocking the Nippon Steel acquisition of U.S. Steel and finds them . . . lacking. He unpacks the danger in calling things a “national security threat” disingenuously, and makes the case that the big beneficiary of blocking this deal is an Asian country, but it isn’t Japan.

David does a deep analysis of the arguments for blocking the Nippon Steel acquisition of U.S. Steel and finds them . . . lacking.{ai:summary}<p>David critiques the arguments against Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel, labeling them insufficient. He warns against misusing the term "national security threat" and suggests that blocking the deal may primarily benefit a different Asian nation, not Japan. #economy</p>

A Friendly Enemy and Treacherous Friend

Loading...