In the landscape of economic foresight, John Exter, a distinguished hard money advocate and former precious metals expert for The Fed, offers a model that resonates with the principles upheld here at SchiffGold.
Developed in the 1970s, Exter’s Inverted Pyramid of Risk remains as relevant as ever, especially in assessing assets through the lens of counterparty risk.
The pyramid serves as a guide to comprehend the risks facing America, particularly in anticipation of what may be the most severe credit crisis in the coming decade or two, centered around the USD crisis.
We feature this in our “Why buy Gold” report under the “Research and Analysis” section on SchiffGold.com
Organized from the most illiquid and highest counterparty risk assets to the least risky and most liquid, the layers of the inverted pyramid provide a unique perspective that builds from the mindset of a counterparty-risk sensitive investor. A swift glance at the pyramid reveals that the removal of any assets on the lower end (the more narrow base), will lead to the downfall of everything associated with it on the higher end, akin to a collapsing Jenga tower.
This model also unveils the flow of capital during economic phases.
In times of credit expansion, capital ascends the inverse pyramid into higher-risk, lower-liquidity assets. This occurs when investors see systemic economic safety and are comfortable taking on greater risks for higher returns. Note, that the broadening of the pyramid signifies the reusing of the same capital as collateral multiple times (e.g., fractional reserve banking, margin trading), contributing to an exponential amount of theoretical contracted capital found on the higher layers. This may sound astonishing, but the widely held belief is that the value of assets trading in the white layer derivative layer reaches into the quadrillions!
In a crisis, deflation is observed as credit flows down the pyramid toward higher-liquidity, lower-risk assets like bonds, cash, and gold. This occurs as capital is recalled and flows back to more stable ground, illustrating the waterfall of credit returning to the bedrock of the financial system—risk-off assets with minimal counterparty risk. Depending on the severity of the financial crisis, one may actually see a greater allocation in yellow-layer assets rather than the base layer of gold. Interestingly, this in part explains why Treasuries tend to do better than gold initially on the onset of a crisis.
The insight here is that there are layers of risk often unseen or incomprehensible to many. John Exter’s inverted pyramid provides a contextual view of capital and credit flows during macroeconomic expansions and contractions. When considering potential investments or business opportunities, there’s more at stake than just examining a balance sheet. Unfortunately, our financial system is inherently flawed, relying on credit notes we designate as ‘money.’ The foundation is compromised, yet the entire global financial structure is built upon it, creating frustration on various fronts. Business operators can’t solely focus on being savvy entrepreneurs and ignore the interventions of central planners.
Similarly, savers cannot accumulate capital with the expectation of passing it down without being significantly impacted by decisions made by figures like Jerome Powell. The silver lining, however, lies in an alternative – John Exter’s foundational base layer, gold. This means that individuals are not bound by the uncertainties of government-centric central planning. Any personal capital stored in gold enjoys liberation from credit risk, bank failures, currency devaluation, and much more.