THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 23, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Susan Ferrechio


NextImg:U.S. attorney investigating Biden-Ukraine ties faced intense scrutiny, resistance from FBI top brass

The U.S. attorney assigned to look into the Biden family’s deals in Ukraine, including allegations they pocketed a $10 million bribe, told House lawmakers his investigation was significantly hobbled by the Justice Department and FBI headquarters.

Scott Brady, who was the U.S. attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, described to lawmakers in a closed-door interview this week that the top brass at the FBI showed an intense interest in his investigation of the Bidens’ ties to a Ukraine energy company. The bureau, he said, tried to slow down or halt his investigation at every turn. 

According to a transcript reviewed by The Washington Times, Mr. Brady said the FBI special agents he assigned to work on the investigation were frequently stalled or blocked from pursuing the case by top officials at FBI headquarters. 

At one point his team was blocked for five months from advancing the investigation.

“It was incredibly challenging and we did not make much progress at all,” said Mr. Brady, who resigned as U.S. attorney in February 2021.

Mr. Brady was tasked in 2020 by Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen with determining the credibility of evidence and claims related to the Bidens and their business dealings in Ukraine

SEE ALSO: Biden accused of pocketing a $5 million bribe while vice president

A key piece of evidence under Mr. Brady’s review was the transcript of an interview with one of the FBI’s most credible confidential human sources who said he was told then-Vice President Biden and his son Hunter Biden each accepted a $5 million bribe from the owner of a Ukrainian energy firm, Burisma.  

Mr. Brady determined the allegation was credible enough to warrant further investigation and alerted three U.S. attorney’s offices, including the Delaware office investigating Hunter Biden on tax fraud charges. 

None of them followed up. 

Mr. Brady’s investigation took place while Mr. Biden was running for president and concluded weeks before the 2020 election, when Mr. Biden was the Democratic presidential nominee.

“I think there was reluctance on the part of the FBI to really do any tasking related to our assignment … looking into allegations of Ukrainian corruption broadly and then specifically anything that intersected with Hunter Biden and his role in Burisma. It was very challenging,” Mr Brady told lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee in the Oct. 23 interview.

Mr. Brady’s agents, assigned to him from the FBI’s Pittsburgh office, were required to obtain an unusual level of permission from FBI headquarters to advance every aspect of the investigation, he said. 

SEE ALSO: Hunter Biden vulnerable to federal charges for unpaid taxes from his $1M-a-year job in Ukraine

In at least one instance, 17 different FBI officials were required to sign off on extending Mr. Brady’s pursuit of Ukraine-related information involving the Bidens.

“There was a larger group at the FBI, including FBI headquarters, that had eyes on what was happening, and which required signoff for any investigative steps that FBI Pittsburg was asked to take by us,” Mr. Brady said. 

Mr. Brady was interviewed privately by the House Judiciary Committee as part of its probe into whether the Justice Department interfered in the federal government’s investigation into Hunter Biden on tax fraud and gun violations and whether investigators were blocked from pursuing evidence of corruption involving President Biden.

Separately on Wednesday, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland alerting them to “an effort among certain Justice Department and FBI officials to improperly delay and stop full and complete investigative activity into the Biden family.” 

Mr. Grassley, who has been investigating the Biden family’s foreign business deals for several years, said he’s tracked more than 40 confidential sources who have provided allegations to the FBI of crimes related to the family’s business deals. 

Mr. Biden, now under a House impeachment inquiry into the corruption allegations, has denied them all and said he was not involved in his family’s business deals.

Mr. Brady’s investigation involved one of the most sensational allegations — bribery of Mr. Biden while he was vice president — and his team determined it was credible enough to warrant more examination, he told House lawmakers.

The allegations are described in an unclassified document that had been concealed by the FBI for years.

In it, a longtime credible FBI source reported Burisma executives told him they hired Hunter Biden to serve on the board of their gas company to “protect us through his dad from all kinds of problems.” The source also told the FBI that Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky claimed in 2015 or 2016 he had to pay $5 million to Hunter Biden and $5 million to then-Vice President Biden in exchange for their help shaking off a corruption probe into the company. 

Mr. Brady’s investigative team “felt that there were sufficient indicia of credibility … to merit further investigation,” into the claim. 

In late October 2020, Mr. Brady’s office provided the document and a “substantive briefing,” on their findings to the U.S. attorney’s office in Delaware which was investigating Hunter Biden on the tax fraud and gun charges. 

Among those at the briefing was Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf, who IRS whistleblowers have accused of slow-walking or interfering in their probe of Hunter Biden in the tax fraud case. The whistleblowers said Ms. Wolf also blocked their attempts to follow evidence they discovered that may have implicated Mr. Biden, who was then the Democratic presidential nominee.  

The group listened to the presentation by Brady’s team without asking any questions and never followed up on it, Mr. Brady said.

He also told investigators his office had difficulty developing a channel of communication with the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s office regarding his probe of Ukraine and the Biden family. 

“I think there was both a skepticism of the information we were developing, that we had received, and skepticism and then weariness of the information,” Mr. Brady said. “I think they were very concerned about any information-sharing with our office.”

Mr. Brady said the lack of cooperation forced him to intervene on behalf of his investigators and involve David Weiss, then the U.S. attorney for Delaware who has since been appointed special counsel in the Hunter Biden tax fraud and gun crime case.

Mr. Brady said he was kept in the dark about key developments in the federal government’s developing case against Hunter Biden.

He did not learn about his discarded laptop, for instance, until he read about it in the news. 

Mr. Brady said he was surprised the FBI did not alert him to the laptop sooner.

“Especially, as has been reported, there’s information relating to Hunter Biden’s activities on the board of Burisma in Ukraine, that might have been helpful in our assessment of the information that we were receiving about him,” Mr. Brady said. “I would have expected that to be shared.”

House investigators have been probing the Biden family’s business deals for months, scouring bank records and interviewing witnesses who worked with Hunter Biden or played a role in investigating him or other family members.

The investigation, led by the Republican majority, has determined Biden family members and their associates pocketed more than $20 million from business deals with China, Ukraine, Russia, Romania and other countries by leveraging Mr. Biden’s powerful position.

Investigators have also determined Mr. Biden was not only aware of the business deals, he phoned in or showed up in person at his son’s business meetings. 

Last week, lawmakers produced a $200,000 check to Mr. Biden from his brother, James Biden, who had just been paid from a business deal with a rural hospital operator. The check was labeled as a loan repayment.

Democrats have dismissed the allegations against Mr. Biden as baseless and politically motivated. 

Justice Department officials have not responded to an inquiry from The Times about Mr. Brady’s testimony. Attorney General Merrick Garland denies taking steps to shield Mr. Biden or his son.

• Susan Ferrechio can be reached at sferrechio@washingtontimes.com.