President Trump’s proposal for an “Iron Dome for America” represents an ambitious plan to develop a comprehensive missile defense shield, despite critics dismissing it as unrealistic for a nation the size of the United States. National security experts clarify that the proposal isn’t meant to replicate Israel’s Iron Dome system literally, but rather serves as a rhetorical device to communicate Trump’s commitment to advancing America’s missile defense capabilities.
Former Missile Defense Agency Director Lt. Gen. Henry Obering III explains that the term “Iron Dome” resonates with average Americans due to its proven effectiveness in Israel. The proposed system would focus on protecting against more sophisticated threats, including ballistic and hypersonic missiles from adversaries like China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.
Current U.S. missile defenses show significant vulnerabilities, according to military experts. Retired Navy Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery notes that the country currently lacks comprehensive defense capabilities against conventional cruise or ballistic missile attacks. While the U.S. has some ground-based systems, including installations in California, Alaska and Hawaii, these defenses would be insufficient against a large-scale attack from major powers.
However, technological advances, particularly in space-based capabilities, offer promising solutions. Experts suggest that deploying approximately 1,000 space-based interceptors could be achieved for around $20 billion — significantly less than the $60 billion spent on ground-based systems during the Bush administration.
The administration’s vision extends beyond traditional missile threats. Incoming National Security Adviser Mike Waltz has indicated that the system would also need to address drone threats, suggesting a comprehensive approach to airspace protection.
Read more: Once dismissed, Trump’s ’Iron Dome for America’ missile shield now within reach
This article is written with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence based solely on Washington Times original reporting and wire services. For more information, please read our AI policy or contact Ann Wog, Managing Editor for Digital, at awog@washingtontimes.com
The Washington Times AI Ethics Newsroom Committee can be reached at aispotlight@washingtontimes.com.