THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Sep 20, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Stephen Dinan and Alex Swoyer


NextImg:Trump asks Supreme Court to block ‘gender identity’ passports

President Trump took the transgender fight back to the Supreme Court on Friday, asking the justices to block lower court rulings that would force him to issue passports conforming to applicants’ own gender identity, saying it’s at odds with “scientific reality.”

Solicitor General D. John Sauer said passports aren’t places for free speech or individual expression but rather are a form of communication with other governments that falls under a president’s foreign policy powers. Refusing to let the president set the policy infringes on his powers.

“A U.S. passport is a government document; it represents the speech of the government, not respondents,” he said.



President Biden created gender identity-friendly passports, letting Americans select M or F or even X as they chose. Mr. Trump issued an executive order revoking that and returning to the previous situation for passports to “accurately reflect the holder’s sex.”

Mr. Trump said that was safer and more secure than relying on a “subjective sense of self.”

“That policy is eminently lawful. The Constitution does not prohibit the government from defining sex in terms of an individual’s biological classification,” Mr. Sauer told the justices in a filing asking the high court to block the lower court rulings on the matter.

U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick, a Biden appointee to the court in Massachusetts, had issued an injunction erasing Mr. Trump’s policy nationwide.

She ruled that the restriction amounted to unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex, citing a 2020 Supreme Court case that found employment discrimination against transgender people illegal.

Advertisement

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backed Judge Kobick’s ruling.

Mr. Sauer, though, said the case is closer to last term’s Supreme Court ruling involving medical treatment for transgender children. In that case, the justices didn’t find sex discrimination in state laws restricting such treatment.

The solicitor general asked the justices to issue a stay blocking the lower court rulings from taking effect while the case continues to develop.

• Stephen Dinan can be reached at sdinan@washingtontimes.com.

• Alex Swoyer can be reached at aswoyer@washingtontimes.com.