The Supreme Court is expected to consider a landmark case that could give President Trump expanded firing powers by potentially overturning a 90-year-old precedent that limits presidential authority. Here’s what you need to know about this consequential constitutional question:

The core question

Court may reconsider fundamental separation of powers balance:

The specific case

Legal challenge stems from administration actions:

The historical precedent

Humphrey’s Executor has shaped government for decades:

The current Court

Composition suggests potential receptiveness to change:

The potential impact

Ruling could fundamentally reshape federal government:

The legal arguments

Case centers on competing constitutional interpretations:

The political context

Case emerges amid broader administrative battles:

What happens next

Several key developments are anticipated:

Read more:

• Supreme Court expected to consider giving Trump firing power by overruling precedent

This article is written with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence based solely on Washington Times original reporting and wire services. For more information, please read our AI policy or contact Ann Wog, Managing Editor for Digital, at awog@washingtontimes.com

The Washington Times AI Ethics Newsroom Committee can be reached at aispotlight@washingtontimes.com.