We have come to the point in transgenderism that to “do no harm” is subject more to interpretation than to dictate. Government actors are starting to turn the tide on child endangerment in this realm, but the sad reality is even that is a bit too late — the harm starts far before hormone treatments.

When reality shifted to accept that biological men could become women, every idea became believable. Medical professionals then colluded to determine, unfoundedly, that hormones and surgeries were the gold standard for treating gender dysphoria in young people. The recent Department of Health and Human Services “Gender Dysphoria Report” reveals just how exploitative the medical industry was of this opening, and as such, how it “failed children and adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria.” Downstream effects, of course, reach children who have no active role in the matter.

Recommended Stories

• New media is starting to look just like the old media
• A Democratic congressman tried to reduce Pete Hegseth’s salary to $1
• Net deadly: Europe’s blackouts are a warning for Americans

The collusion “suppressed dissent and stifled debate,” per the HHS report. It was an effort to expedite wants, in place of the usual need for ethical processing. That aspect of leftist ideology is familiar to us in the form of in vitro fertilization, abortion, and most everything else related to current race and sex issues. In the scope of children’s rights, the heuristic is especially devastating. Surrogacy, for example, has landed countless children in the hands of pedophiles and will continue to do so. More specific to the transgender issue, and less considered for its heinousness, is the place of infants in an even more warped, because it is “stifled,” sexual landscape.

Whatever gives rise to gender dysphoria in a person, a lot of its expression is fetishistic. This much is visible in the number of man-to-woman transitioners, over those female-to-male, as well as the movement’s latching on to overt hypersexualization. Pride parades go to no lengths to hide their costumes of sexual gear, and nor does the movement try to distance itself from drag events. Sexual freedom is the No. 1 express prize of transgender freedom — it is just baked into the overall concept of self-expression. It may seem at times that society has peaked in sexual liberation, until the budding avenues of polyamory and the male birth control pill show their prominence.

This route brings the expanse of options to male breastfeeding. In their transition to womanhood, many men elect to “grow” breasts. It is a simple thought process for a man to want some of his own, and however reckless it seems to go through with the process, there is some semblance of psychological sense to it. It all becomes more confusing when “gender identity” enters to deny sexual reality, and all worsens from there. But that baseline, of the male interest in female form and experience, enlightens the blatant child abuse that characterizes a transgender-identifying man’s breastfeeding activity.

COLORADO’S GENDER IDEOLOGY BILL IS A WARNING TO THE NATION

In fact, that much is admitted in writing by one advocate: “Imagine the most electric thing a partner has ever done to you, then multiply it by 10.” Crucially: “Yeah, I kind of got off on it.” His perspective is doubtless shared by others. On top of the obvious, the behind-the-scenes process involves the trans-identifying man taking a formula of drugs to induce lactation. These chemicals, along with the chemical cocktail that enables the gender transition, are pumped into the hungry infant. 

It should require no moral assessment to condemn as much. If surrogacy, IVF, and hormone treatments are not convincing enough, this next step up illuminates the literal commodification of children. There is little wonder at the wave of people, especially young people, that has cropped up with sex-related mental problems. We mistreat children during their most vital and vulnerable years, all for the sake of shortsighted ideological advancement. So we must ask ourselves: Just how opportunistic is this shortsightedness?