<em>Washington Examiner</em> commentary editor Conn Carroll joins investigations editor Sarah Bedford to discuss Vice President <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/tag/kamala-harris/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="">Kamala Harris</a>‘s ticket policy being less pro-family compared to the <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/tag/donald-trump/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="">Trump</a> ticket, the “grandmother hypothesis” Sen. <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/tag/jd-vance/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="">J.D. Vance</a> (R-OH) didn’t disagree with on a podcast, and the <em>New York Times</em> profile on Sen. James Lankford (R-OK).

Washington Examiner commentary editor Conn Carroll discusses Vice President Kamala Harris's ticket policy being less pro-family compared to the Trump ticket.{ai:summary}<p>In a world where family ties fray like old rope, Conn Carroll and Sarah Bedford debate Kamala Harris’s less-than-family-friendly ticket policy against Trump’s. They toss around ideas like the “grandmother hypothesis”—and Sen. Lankford’s New York Times profile doesn’t go unnoticed.</p><p>Politics can be a murky game where the players rarely win. #politics</p>

The Debrief with Conn Carroll: Harris’s ticket policy less ‘pro-family’ - Washington Examiner

Loading...