In response to the subpoena sent by the House Oversight Committee, an attorney for Hunter Biden rebuffed the committee's demand for the president’s son to sit for a closed-door deposition and instead offered for him to testify before a public committee hearing in December.

Earlier this month, Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) sent subpoenas to Hunter Biden, James Biden, the president’s brother, and Rob Walker, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, to sit for deposition as part of House Republican’s impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

NEW HOME SALES FELL IN OCTOBER AS HOUSING MARKET HIT BY HISTORIC MORTGAGE RATES

In a letter to Comer, Abbe Lowell, an attorney for Hunter Biden, rejected the closed-door request and instead wants his client to testify before a public committee hearing.

“We have seen you use closed door sessions to manipulate, even distort the facts and misinform the public. We therefore propose opening the door. If, as you claim, your efforts are important and involve issues that Americans should know about, then let the light shine on these proceedings,” the letter reads. “Accordingly, our client will get right to it by agreeing to answer any pertinent and relevant question you or your colleagues might have, but— rather than subscribing to your cloaked, one-sided process—he will appear at a public Oversight and Accountability Committee hearing.”

Comer has been under pressure from those on the right to subpoena Hunter Biden, who is at the center of the inquiry, and get him to testify. And while the subpoena was for a closed-door deposition, his offer to testify publicly will likely be welcomed by the hardline conservative members of the committee.

The inquiry is focused on how Biden, throughout his time as vice president and a private citizen, allegedly utilized his role and power to help enrich his family members and whether or not he personally profited from his family’s foreign business dealings.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“Your Committee has been working for almost a year—without success—to tie our client’s business activities to his father,” the letter says. “You state that one of your purposes is to review how a President’s family’s business activities raise ethics and disclosure concerns to inform the basis for a legislative solution. But all your focus has been on this President’s family while turning a blind eye toward former President Trump and his family’s businesses, some of which the family maintained while serving in office—an area ripe to inform your purported legislative pursuits. “

A spokesperson for House Oversight did not immediately have a comment on the letter.