The Democratic Party is dominated by single women, and it is going to keep things that way. Vice President Kamala Harris confirmed as much in her speech at the Democratic National Convention.
After she spent the first half giving a detailed autobiographical account, the latter half centered on former President Donald Trump. Harris focused her ire on the Trump administration’s contributions to anti-abortion efforts.
While Harris tried to list heart-wrenching examples of resultant suffering, they all came off rather absurd, given that she was using them to promote abortion. A moment of particular irony came as Harris bemoaned women “losing the ability to ever have children.” Meanwhile, free vasectomies, and abortions, from Planned Parenthood were the pride of the DNC.
If Harris had not yet revealed just how anti-man her platform is, she has now. No matter their parading of “reproductive freedom,” Democrats cannot claim to have the good of men in mind. They want the terms of childbearing to be set completely on women’s terms, so much so that they encourage campaigns to debilitate men by means of vasectomy.
So, Harris does not care what stake men have in humanity — and she asks GOP members why it is “that they don’t trust women.”
We’ll put it aside that it is ridiculous to claim that opposition to abortion and birth control really has anything to do with women, trusting them even less so. But say that Republican lawmakers did have latent misgivings about the intentions of women in these matters: Might not their impressions be the least bit founded? Harris wants to trust only women and to take men out of the equation entirely. These efforts are evident enough in her tax credit policies that favor single mothers and punish married ones, and glaring when even something such as vasectomy availability is a matter of “trusting women.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
When a party says it has no need for men despite an obviously two-gendered reality, men will not trust it. This line of reasoning is simple and almost identical to what a liberal woman might argue pushed her over to distrust of the Republican Party. Still, Harris’s assertion to “trust women” on reproductive affairs is a moot point: She wants to take objectivity out of a clearly black-and-white matter. Were the conclusion not objective, to Democrats, it would have been silly to erect Harris’s whole campaign around it.
Democrats hyperpromote female childlessness while arguing that control of progeny must be entirely in women’s hands. It’s a confusing argument — nonsensical, even. More so, it does nothing to heal the fractures between men and women the Democratic Party has created in the name of planning parenthood.