Multiple members of California Common Cause’s advisory board have resigned as the nonpartisan group, historically critical of partisan gerrymandering, tackles its conflicting response to the national redistricting battle.

Last week, the national chapter of the group reversed its long-held position and backed California’s push to redraw its congressional districts. The group described it as a “counterbalance measure” to President Donald Trump’s public call for Texas and other red states to redraw maps to secure additional House seats before the 2026 midterm elections.

Recommended Stories

• Mike Rogers claims Michigan Democrats 'trying to out-left each other' on Israel stance in Senate race
• Tim Scott credits crypto lobby for ousting Sherrod Brown
• Republicans use Democratic threat of impeachment to motivate Trump voters 

While the total number of departures on California’s advisory board is not known, Common Cause President and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón told Politico’s Playbook that members resigned “after expressing disagreement with the fairness criteria” the organization’s national board created as guardrails around the kinds of mid-decade redistricting California is pursuing.

“Their perspectives have been valuable, and we are grateful for their service,” Solomón said.

Two weeks ago, the organization had pop-up fundraising appeals on its website that slammed Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) for “attempting to copy the GOP’s playbook to boost his profile.” A July 24 newsletter from the group also called the actions of Texas Republicans and Newsom “wrong” and said “all of it is anti-democratic.”

That position changed last week when the group posted on its website that it would not oppose Newsom’s efforts.

“In the current mid-decade redistricting battle, we recognize that President Trump and Republican leaders are pursuing a calculated, asymmetric strategy to redraw districts mid-decade in states like Texas, to lock in unaccountable power and silence voters,” the group posted on its website last Tuesday. “This is not an isolated political tactic; it is part of a broader march toward authoritarianism, dismantling people-powered democracy, and stripping away the people’s ability to have a political voice and say in how they are governed.”

The group said while it would not endorse partisan gerrymandering “even when its motive is to offset more extreme gerrymandering by a different party,” it added that a “blanket condemnation in this moment would amount to a call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian efforts to undermine fair representation and people-powered democracy.”

COMMON CAUSE CHANGES TUNE ON CALIFORNIA REDISTRICTING FIGHT

Common Cause said it was establishing six-point fairness criteria by which it would assess states’ maps. They include proportionality, public participation, racial equity, federal reform, endorsement of independent redistricting, and time limits, meaning any new maps must expire after the 2030 census and be replaced through a regular decennial redistricting process.

Common Cause California did not return a request by the Washington Examiner for comment.