There's been a lot of buzz the last few days about World War III. President Donald Trump has promised no more wars, but also posted "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER" in all-caps to Truth Social, along with the tidbit that the U.S. knows exactly where the Ayatollah Khamenei is holded up. "He is an easy target, but he is safe there," posted Trump. "We are not going to take him out (kill!!), at least not for now." We're hoping "we" means Israel.

One concern that a couple of conservatives have had is that the United States will end up taking in refugees from Iran and elsewhere in the Middle East.

And our most famous Somalian refugee is saying that the United States is "turning into <a href="https://twitchy.com/warren-squire/2025/06/17/rep-ilhan-omar-we-are-turning-into-one-of-the-worst-countries-on-earth-n2414370" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">one of the worst countries on Earth</a>." That's appreciation.

This might be the best reason yet for the United States to keep its distance from Iran and Israel's war.

 {ai:summary}<p>Concerns are rising about potential U.S. involvement in conflicts in the Middle East, particularly regarding the influx of refugees. Many conservatives fear that military action could lead to a significant number of migrants entering the U.S., disrupting local cultures and communities.</p><p>Critics argue that historical precedents show a pattern of refugees following foreign interventions, with calls to prevent any resettlement in the U.S. They advocate for neighboring countries to take responsibility for refugees, asserting that many migrants are economic rather than genuine refugees. #illegals</p>

Will the US Be Taking in Refugees From the Middle East? The Consensus Is No

Loading...