The wheels appear to be completely falling off the Harris campaign as they enter the home stretch of the election, and things just got even more awkward for Team Kamala:&nbsp;

Now we'll sit back and wait for some of the Post's totally objective and unbiased "journalists" get incredibly angry over this decision:&nbsp;

The Post has endorsed a presidential candidate for decades, but not this year. They were joined by the L.A. Times.

It appears to boil down to something quite simple: The Post's leadership didn't feel like jumping aboard what they seem to sense is a ship that's sinking fast.&nbsp;

The Democrats might be wishing they'd have just stuck with Joe Biden at this point.

 {ai:summary}<p>The Washington Post has announced it will not endorse a presidential candidate in the upcoming election, a decision that has not occurred since the 1980s. This follows a similar move by the L.A. Times, reflecting a shift towards giving readers an independent choice. </p><p>The decision has raised eyebrows, particularly regarding Kamala Harris's campaign, with some commentators suggesting it signals a lack of confidence in her candidacy. Democrats may be reconsidering their strategy as the election approaches. #politics</p>

WaPo Couldn't Decide If Kamala Harris Is Better Than Literally Hitler, Won't Be Endorsing Anybody

Loading...