<em>Scientific American</em> has many saying the magazine has abandoned actual science for political ideology. Recently, the mag was touting approaching so-called ‘climate change’ from a feminist perspective and throwing around leftist political buzzwords like ‘gender-equality’ and ‘gender-diverse’ (whatever the heck that means).

Many posters wonder if the magazine’s writers really believe the nonsense they’re spewing in the name of science.

Others wonder how ‘climate change’ manages to avoid men who know they’re men, but strikes out at women and men who pretend to be women. That doesn’t sound scientific at all.

Assigning decision-making abilities to weather or climate sounds more spiritual or magic-based than scientific.

<em>Scientific American</em> magazine’s editor-in-chief resigned in mid-November. She lashed out at Trump voters. Some thought this would result in the magazine embracing science again and forsaking transgender magic and leftist political preaching. That obviously didn’t happen.

 {ai:summary}<p>Scientific American faces criticism for allegedly prioritizing political ideology over scientific rigor, particularly regarding its recent focus on climate change through a feminist lens. Critics argue that the magazine's claims about gender and climate impact lack scientific basis and reflect leftist political agendas.</p><p>Many commentators express skepticism about the magazine's credibility, suggesting that its narratives are more ideological than factual. The resignation of its editor-in-chief in November, who criticized Trump voters, has not led to a return to traditional scientific discourse, according to detractors. #science</p>

Unscientific American: Magazine Preaches Feminist and Transgender Approach to ‘Climate Change’

Loading...