It's hard to determine if today's journalists are just really this dumb or if they are just pretending. In this case, it's probably just pretending to be dumb.

No, women used to dress up as men because women were not allowed to be in the military. They had no choice. It wasn't because they wanted to be men. They had to behave that way out of desperation. They weren't ready to cut their breasts off and take hormones, for goodness sake.

This is what making progressive politics your religion does to your brain.

Women get to just be women and also serve these days! What a world.

If it fits their current political narrative, they really don't care how disrespectful it is to people in the past.

Hopefully, that's an example they can understand. Cartoons are about their level.

Please, do not give them any ideas. They are dumb enough to take this seriously.

Love for their country and their cause compelled them to do whatever it took to fight. They weren't trying to become trans.

Apparently, that is where we've landed. Sigh.

 {ai:summary}<p>There is a debate surrounding the portrayal of women who disguised themselves as men to serve in the military, particularly during historical conflicts like the Civil War. Critics argue that labeling these women as transgender misrepresents their motivations, which were rooted in necessity rather than identity.</p><p>Many assert that these women dressed as men solely to participate in the war effort, not out of a desire to transition. The discussion highlights concerns over historical accuracy and respect for the valor of those women, suggesting that contemporary narratives may distort their experiences for political agendas. #society</p>

The Washington Post Denies Valor of Female War Heroes, Claims They Were Trans

Loading...