Well, we're totally convinced that the information Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been putting out about the Russia collusion hoax ahead of the 2016 election has been fully debunked.

Well, maybe we're not actually very convinced, but Susan Rice shared an op-ed that she says is a thorough debunking of what's coming out the the DNI's office. Oh, and it's worth noting that the op-ed was written by James Clapper, John Brennan, and perhaps a few attorneys: 

Brennan and Clapper? Ha! So basically it depends on what your definition of "debunked" is. 

We're just at the beginning of the "screaming" process regarding the Dem freakout about the exposure of their shenanigans. 

Two of the guys implicated in the "Russia collusion" hoax had an op-ed published in the Times, then libs cite that as proof "debunking" the original material. It's like a defense attorney showing the jury an article the defendant wrote about why he's innocent and saying it sinks the prosecution's case. 

Hey, who knows!? If you haven't yet heard about the "burn bag bonanza" read more about that here. 

Yeah, that is weird. 

By the way, the broadcast networks have devoted very little coverage to the documents Gabbard's been releasing (as in "less than a minute"). You can't loathe the MSM too much.