


Last night the Democrats acted like pouty children, stormed out of President Trump's address to a joint session of Congress (one of them got kicked out at the start of the speech), didn't applaud or even acknowledge the family of Laken Riley, and ditto for a young man who's been fighting cancer and was made an honorary member of the Secret Service.
But one of the real issues for "journalists" was something Trump said about Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and it's not a new part of the president's repertoire. If you missed it this is how Trump honored the Senate's most notorious non-Native American:
The legacy media can always be counted on to get triggered on behalf of a Democrats. In this case it was a Reuters White House reporter:
Seriously? Clay Travis had a good question:
Mocking Warren for faking a heritage is not a "racial slur" but of course a journo's kneejerk defense is going to be to defend the Dem.
You would think.
Exactly.
CNN was also a bit triggered on Warren's behalf:
It's only a "divisive nickname" if you're somebody who's claiming to be something you're not and don't like it getting called out.
Funny how that always works, isn't it? Gotta love "journalism"!