This is as close to feeling pure <em>schadenfreude</em> as this writer has ever come.

For years, the Left has argued that gender is fluid. That was the basis in which they sought unlimited power and control over the language. Because gender was fluid, they argued, they couldn't be held to any gender norms and could be perpetually offended by, well, everything.

So to see that argument come back and bite them on the butt warms the cockles of this writer's heart.

This is correct: civil rights are based on immutable human traits. If gender is fluid and changing, it's not immutable.

They want to have their metaphorical cake and eat it, too.

It really doesn't sound like thing are going well for the trans activist crowd.

We'll see what the Supreme Court does when they issue their ruling on the case.

 {ai:summary}<p>The debate over gender fluidity has intensified, particularly in the context of civil rights. Justice Alito's inquiry into whether trans status is immutable has sparked discussions about the implications of gender fluidity on civil rights, which are traditionally based on immutable traits.</p><p>Critics argue that if gender is indeed fluid, it contradicts the foundation of civil rights protections. The ongoing discourse raises questions about the future of definitions and rights related to gender identity, especially as the Supreme Court prepares to issue a ruling on the matter. #society</p>

Pure BRILLIANCE: Justice Alito Just WRECKED the Trans Civil Rights Argument

Loading...