Thanks to POLITICO, losing candidate for Virginia's House of Delegates Susanna Gibson is speaking out. Or just digging the hole deeper. POLITICO is engaging in the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy in its headline; she lost her election after her sex life was exposed. But is that why she lost the election? They sure make it seem that way.

Her online sex life consisted of committing sexual acts with her husband on Chaturbate, where they'd opened an account to post sex videos in exchange for "tokens." We'd say that she exposed her own sex life online, but we guess we're supposed to believe she's the victim here. After all, her world was rocked on 9/11.

Alexander Burns writes:

The last three months of a campaign are just a blur. Can you talk about what that experience was like for you, having to do the home sprint of a campaign with this other issue on top of it?

My entire life was rocked on Sept. 11, when the article ran. It ran, implying that I performed sex acts online with my husband for money. It was really written based on this Dropbox file that self-described Republican operatives shopped around. They had found these videos on the dark web and shopped them around to various news outlets. I didn’t have any idea that there were ever videos of me that had been made and uploaded to multiple sites.

I think it was Sept. 7, I was in clinic seeing patients and a reporter reached out to my campaign, trying to get my phone number. That’s how I found out. When you find out that there are sexually explicit videos of you online, especially by being contacted by national reporters — it is a feeling that I would not wish on my worst enemy.

Ha ha … the "dark web." She had no idea that there were ever videos made of her.

The Spectator has even run a piece on the POLITICO interview, it's so bad:

Why is POLITICO trying to rehabilitate Gibson's reputation, anyway? She and her husband opened a Chaturbate account, set up a video camera, and asked for donations, and she claims she didn't know the videos were out there.