It’s pretty accepted that if you don’t know the details about something, you should keep your mouth shut. Well, David Brooks of The New York Times doesn’t practice that common-sense principle. On Sunday, he was blabbing about the Wisconsin judge who is in legal hot water over allegedly helping an illegal alien evade ICE in her courthouse. He self-admits he doesn’t know the details of the story but claims Judge Hannah Dugan is a ‘hero.’

Start here. (READ)

NYT’s David Brooks doesn’t "know the specific details" of the Judge Dugan case — but says she was “heroic."

“If the federal enforcement agencies come to your courtroom and you help a guy escape, that is two things..."

“One, it strikes me as maybe something illegal, but it also strikes me as something heroic."

Un. Freaking. Real.

Hear Brooks say it. (WATCH)

A simple ‘I’m sorry, I don’t know the details of that case, and it would be highly inappropriate for me to comment on it’ would have sufficed. Show some ethical restraint, David.

Commenters noticed that missing from these uninformed discussions are the two people who were in court for allegedly being assaulted by the illegal alien, the ‘heroic’ judge was also allegedly sneaking out.

Illegal aliens always take precedence over American citizens, per the legacy media and the Democrat Party.

Some posters say the crazy narrative shifts are too much for them to handle.

It’s always about power, standards have nothing to do with it. They just get in the way.