A tenet of all of the things RFK has fought for is better ingredients in American food. He wonders why there are items allowed in our food supply banned in Europe and Canada. The NYT decided &nbsp;to 'fact check' him in an effort to discredit him.&nbsp;

Oh, so other than that, it's exactly the same.

So, Canada colors their cereal with blueberries and carrots, but the US uses arsenic, but other than that, what is the difference, really?

It's wild this got past at least four allegedly literate adults.

He's working with Donald Trump, though, so he must be scorned.

Journalism in the West is just committed to protecting Democrats at all costs. That's mostly the problem with it.

 {ai:summary}<p>Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has raised concerns about the quality of ingredients in American food compared to those in Europe and Canada. The New York Times attempted to fact-check his claims, leading to criticism for allegedly misrepresenting the differences in food safety standards and ingredients.</p><p>Critics argue that the NYT's fact-checking process failed to acknowledge the significant discrepancies in food safety regulations, highlighting a broader issue within mainstream journalism regarding accuracy and bias. The discourse reflects a growing skepticism towards media narratives. #society</p>

NYT Attempts to Fact Check RFK, Jr, and it Goes 'CEREAL-OUSLY' Wrong

Loading...