This week Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified a congressional report and dropped a lot of receipts showing that then President Barack Obama, some in the intelligence community, along with other Democrats, concocted a "Russia collusion" narrative ahead of the 2016 election. Ironically it sounds like the kind of misinformation campaign Russia might have come up with, all while the Dems claimed Trump was Putin's puppet. The projection level was off the charts.&nbsp;

That's a big story, right? Well, the Office of the DNI noticed that the New York Times and Washington Post didn't consider it front page-worthy -- at least not above the fold:&nbsp;

Miranda Devine remembers what the Times and Post were all over a few years ago:&nbsp;&nbsp;

Weird how that works, isn't it? And not only did they help promote a bogus story but some "journalists" also received awards for doing so.&nbsp;

Then they sit around and wonder why the MSM's level of relevance has been on a steady decline.&nbsp;

Tulsi Gabbard exposes media bias on Russia collusion narrative. Why no coverage from NY Times and WaPo?{ai:summary}<p>Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has declassified a report revealing that former President Barack Obama and some Democrats fabricated the "Russia collusion" narrative during the 2016 election. This revelation has sparked criticism over the mainstream media's lack of coverage, particularly from the New York Times and Washington Post.</p><p>Critics argue that the media's failure to report on this significant development reflects a bias, contrasting it with their extensive coverage of the original Russia allegations. The situation raises questions about the media's role in shaping public perception and its declining relevance. #politics</p>

Miranda Devine Gives Tulsi Gabbard an Assist In Calling Out NY Times and WaPo Front Page Disinterest

Loading...