The latest spin from CNN about their story that came via an anonymous leaker is that Pete Hegseth essentially confirmed their reporting after the strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and that journo Natasha Bertrand's original story pointed out that the information came with "low confidence." Neither of those things actually happened.&nbsp;

Don't look now, but there's more "journalism" goal post shifting going on!

CNN's Natasha Bertrand was the subject of an answer from Karoline Leavitt at today's White House briefing, and Trump's press secretary pulled no punches as usual. Bertrand's trail of being fed BS and passing it off as "news" without question is almost unmatched. Watch:&nbsp;

It won't shock anyone to know that the media's hyperventilating at anyone who dares to question Bertrand's reporting integrity and accuracy.&nbsp;

If Bertrand had worked that hard to spread false stories on behalf of the Republicans there's little doubt she'd no longer be employed as a so-called journalist.&nbsp;

Karoline Leavitt challenges CNN's Natasha Bertrand on her questionable reporting history.{ai:summary}<p>CNN is facing criticism for its reporting on a leak regarding Iranian nuclear strikes, with claims that the original report did not include qualifiers like "low confidence" as stated in their recent defense. Critics argue that journalist Natasha Bertrand has a history of unreliable reporting.</p><p>This scrutiny highlights concerns over Bertrand's credibility, especially following her involvement in past controversies, such as the Hunter Biden laptop story. Critics assert that her reliance on anonymous sources undermines the trustworthiness of her reporting. #politics</p>

Karoline Leavitt Rattles Off a List of CNN Reporter's History of Pushing Fake News and OUCH

Loading...