Yesterday's Kamala Harris and Tim Walz interview with Dana Bash on CNN yesterday contained some telling moments, but for the most part it qualified for the label of "softball interview."

There were oh so many issues concerning Harris and Walz that CNN didn't care to get into. The Trump campaign listed several of them:

Compare and contrast the Bash interview with Harris and Walz with these clips of the CNN host's grilling of Trump running mate JD Vance, via @mazemoore. One of these things is not like the other:&nbsp;

Call us crazy, but the tone of those separate interviews seems just a little different.&nbsp;

Even Colbert's liberal audience knew the suggestion that CNN is objective was a joke.&nbsp;

 {ai:summary}<p>An interview with Kamala Harris and Tim Walz on CNN was characterized as a "softball interview," lacking critical questions on controversial topics. Critics pointed out the interview's leniency compared to a more combative approach taken with other guests, such as J.D. Vance. </p><p>The interview highlighted perceived biases in media questioning, raising concerns about journalistic objectivity. The contrasting styles of questioning have sparked discussions on the fairness and rigor of political interviews. #politics</p>

'Juxtaposition of the Day': Dana Bash Was a LITTLE More Combative With JD Vance Than Harris and Walz

Loading...