We could do a whole week of activist judges trying to undermine President Trump and his agenda. On Tuesday alone, we did posts on judges blocking President Trump from discharging transgender troops even after they’ve been medically disqualified, blocking Trump from ending Temporary Protected Status for 350,000 Venezuelans in the U.S. (that was set to expire anyway), and blocking the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence from firing any employees who worked on useless DEI initiatives.

We missed this one:

The Associated Press reports:

The Acacia center provides legal services for unaccompanied migrant children under 18 through a network of legal aid groups that subcontract with the center. Eleven subcontractor groups sued, saying that 26,000 children were at risk of losing their attorneys and that the government has an obligation to come up with a plan for transferring pending cases.

…

The law requires the government to ensure “to the greatest extent practicable” that all children entering the country alone have legal counsel to represent them in proceedings and to “protect them from mistreatment, exploitation, and trafficking.”

Attorneys for the government say that taxpayers have no obligation to pay the cost of direct legal aid to migrant children at a time when the government is trying to save money. They also said district courts have no jurisdiction over a contract termination that would have expired at the end of March.

Unaccompanied migrant children "under 18" … 26,000 children were at risk of losing their attorneys. So basically we're talking about unaccompanied teenagers. And Trump already moved to protect children from exploitation and trafficking by closing the border.

It appears that way, yes.

Interesting.

The judicial tyranny has got to stop. Separation of powers means nothing anymore.