A 'reporter' for<em>&nbsp;The New York Times</em> is apparently shocked that President-Elect Donald Trump is appointing people who will do the jobs they are appointed to do. Go back and read that sentence. We’re not making this up. 'Journalist' Jonathan Swan made the insightful proclamation Sunday. That’s left many posters on X wondering what was Swan expecting them to do.

Posters on X immediately started making fun of Swan.

Several posters went into detail, explaining what appointees are supposed to do for the person who appointed them.

Many came to the conclusion this ‘journalist’ and others believe appointees are supposed to stand in direct opposition to the person who appointed them.

Yes, if only ‘journalists’ had bothered to read Project 2025. They would have discovered Trump’s nefarious plan to appoint department leaders who will do what he wants without him having to ask.

 {ai:summary}<p>A New York Times reporter expressed surprise at President-Elect Donald Trump's appointments, suggesting they will execute his agenda without needing persuasion. This remark sparked ridicule on social media, with users questioning the expectation that appointees should oppose their appointing authority.</p><p>Critics argued that effective leaders hire individuals who align with their vision, and many pointed out that the expectation of sabotage from appointees reflects a misunderstanding of executive appointments. The conversation highlighted a perceived disconnect in political expectations regarding administration dynamics. #politics</p>

‘Journalist’ Shocked Trump’s Appointees Will Do Their Jobs Without Having to Be Asked

Loading...