Even in the face of reality, propagandists for NPR and PBS cannot stop blatantly lying to the public. Over the weekend, both Katherine Maher of NPR and David Brooks of PBS laughably claimed their outlets are… wait for it… ‘straight down the line.’ A lie so absurd that we can’t help but laugh out loud, that anyone would seriously utter it. But here we are.

‘We polled our staff, made up entirely of leftist Democrats, and they say there is no bias!’

One poster says it's all about what ‘straight down the line’ means. Context is important.

Commenters say NPR and PBS do not exist to provide different perspectives but to reinforce a particular one. You can guess which one that is.

Posters say PBS and NPR’s 2024 presidential coverage told them exactly which side of the political fence the two networks obviously stand on.

Any objective person can turn on NPR or&nbsp;PBS and see that both tilt far left. Anyone who says otherwise is lying. There’s no debate.

{ai:summary}NPR and PBS representatives recently claimed their reporting is "straight down the line," a statement met with skepticism and ridicule, particularly from critics who argue that these outlets consistently align with Democratic viewpoints. Observers assert that this claim is a clear example of bias and a failure to acknowledge their partisan leanings.Critics emphasize that both organizations serve to reinforce a specific ideological narrative rather than provide balanced perspectives. Many argue that their coverage during the 2024 presidential election reflected a pronounced leftward tilt, undermining claims of impartiality. #politics

In the Past 48 Hours NPR and PBS Reps Have LAUGHABLY Claimed Their Outlets Are ‘Straight Down the Line’

Loading...