Every so often when a progressive woman wants to show off her edgy, clever protest against the Patriarchy, she trots out this little gem as if it is absolutely devasting.

Well, if you're going to bring up slly stereotypes about women, which apparently are an easy group to distinguish, with clearly defined inherent characteristics all of a sudden, so will we!

Let the HR inappropriate commentary begin!

Sir, that is unnecessary, and you should apologize.

HA! Wait ... no, no, we do not make such jokes *snicker here. Please be respectful!

This is neither the time nor the place for rational analysis, Sir.

This isn't a joke. This is a very important distinction. We need guidelines.

The reason this earns such mockery is because it is vapid and meaningless. The idea women are somehow better leaders because they aren't as irrational or petty as men is a feminist fantasy. But to a leftwing audience it sounds profound and revolutionary. All you have to do in leftwing circles is smugly say something about, 'we wouldn't be in this mess if a WOMAN was in charge,' and everyone laughs and nods and applauds.

 {ai:summary}<p>A recent social media exchange highlights the ongoing debate about women's leadership, sparked by Stephanie Ruhle's assertion that the world needs more women leaders. Critics argue that such statements perpetuate stereotypes and trivialize the complexities of leadership, suggesting that the notion women are inherently better leaders is a simplistic feminist fantasy.</p><p>The conversation quickly devolves into mockery and personal attacks, with various users commenting on the perceived irrationality of women in leadership roles. This reflects a broader skepticism towards the idea that gender alone can determine leadership effectiveness, as many believe such claims lack substance and are often used to garner applause in progressive circles. #society</p>

Honey, You are Ruining it for ALL Women! MSNBC Host Stephanie Ruhle Refreshes Women Leaders Stereotype

Loading...