Greta Van Susteren has been covering and reporting the news for a long, long, long time, so you'd honestly think nothing would surprise her ... and yet her tweet calling the New York Times OUT for defending the monsters who terrorized Jewish students in a college library sounds shocked.
And pissed off.
Take a look:
They were banging on the doors, yelling threats - they were dangerous enough that Jewish students weren't only barricaded into the library but offered a safe space IN THE ATTIC.
But sure, NYT, there was no indication they intended to harm them.
What a crock.
There may be more truth to this than we'd like to believe.
Bu-bu-bingo.
They did indeed bring back a writer who praised Hitler so really this take is more than expected from our pals at the NYT.
Honestly, we'd only be surprised if they called the protesters OUT.
Related:
Editor's Note: Hi there. I know it's been some time since we changed this up but changing it up now to see if any of you read this far. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? ALSO, if you are reading this far please sign up for Twitchy VIP and help us continue bringing you the truth, especially the truth Biden and his Big Tech goons don't want us sharing.