So many people have been triggered by Paramount's $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump over "60 Minutes'" creative editing of candidate Kamala Harris' interview to make her answers sound coherent. And then they refused to release the transcript of the interview. It was a cut-and-paste job to make Harris sound coherent and help her win the election.

There's been a lot of crying from members of the press. CNN's Brian Stelter seems to be particularly pained. John Harwood was nearly at a loss for words. 

Yes, what "60 Minutes" did was repulsive, craven, corrupt, and wrong.

Armen Keteyian has a long past with "60 Minutes" and calls the Paramount settlement "the nadir for the network" that had worked so hard for decades to build trust with the public.

Of course, he shut off replies.

Agreed.

Interfering with elections is what "60 Minutes" does. It has a long and notorious history.

They just won't admit that the collapse of trust is their own doing. Note that Keteyian makes no mention of the selective editing of the Harris interview, no mention of Dan Rather, and shuts down replies like a coward.