As you probably know by now, the Washington Post has triggered the self-described "pro-democracy" crowd on the Left by not endorsing a presidential candidate this year. According to those who are resigning from the paper or cancelling subscriptions, failure to endorse the Democrat candidate is akin to enabling "fascism" to take hold.&nbsp;

To help understand how the media got to this point in the first place, @tomselliott shared video of an interview with a former editor of the Washington Post. This doozy is quite a head-scratcher:&nbsp;

That they can say this without any pangs of irony or introspection whatsoever helps explain how "journalism" became the raging dumpster fire it is.

Pretty amazing, isn't it? Even worse, they do hear what they say and don't find anything a bit "off" about it.

"Democracy dies if we don't only publicly support one party over the other" is quite the take.

 {ai:summary}<p>The Washington Post has faced backlash from the Left for not endorsing a presidential candidate, with some claiming this decision supports "fascism." Former editor comments suggest that not endorsing a Democrat undermines their mission of independent journalism. </p><p>Critics argue that the call for a partisan endorsement contradicts the principles of independent journalism and highlights a perceived bias within the media. #politics</p>

Ex WaPo Editor Concerned Because Not Endorsing Harris Harms the Mission of Independent Journalism

Loading...