It couldn't be more obvious that a fresh talking point has made the rounds on the Left, which is "the country's about to be run by billionaires, for billionaires."

Dinesh D'Souza addressed the new narrative this way:

Another Democrat who's getting in on the "billionaires are bad" talk is Barack Obama's former wingman at the totally nonpartisan DOJ, Eric Holder, who's "tired" of billionaires and their involvement in politics:

What Holder really means is that <em>some</em> billionaires being involved in politics is bad, but certainly not all:&nbsp;

The hypocrisy is, as usual, off the charts.&nbsp;

Along with those who somehow got very wealthy from a career in "public service."

And they continue to not have a clue as to why, which is a positive sign for the future of the Republic.

 {ai:summary}<p>The Left has adopted a narrative criticizing the influence of billionaires in politics, with figures like Eric Holder expressing fatigue over their involvement. However, this criticism appears selective, as some billionaires, particularly those aligned with Democratic interests, seem to escape scrutiny.</p><p>Critics point out the hypocrisy in this stance, highlighting that many political figures who denounce billionaires have their own connections to wealthy donors. The debate raises questions about the integrity of political motives and the perception of wealth in governance. #politics</p>

Eric Holder's 'Tired' of Billionaires Influencing Politics (Except THIS One... and THAT One)

Loading...