This story is not one this writer has heard before, but it also fits with this thread we told you about yesterday: Jimmy Carter's post-presidential work was morally worse than his presidency itself. And that presidency was pretty bad.

Scott Jennings brings a heck of an example of how horrible Carter's actions were.

WATCH:

Jennings is correct.

This writer has seen a lot of 'Iran before Carter' posts floating around X, and the contrast could not be more clear. That's also part of Carter's legacy.

No. His presidency, and everything that came after, left a lasting impact on the world. Often, although not always, not for the better.

And even the humanitarian stuff is largely suspect as these stories come out.

Those of us who weren't around then have no idea how bad it really was.

As the thread yesterday noted, the media did not pull any punches in the obits for Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, or Richard Nixon.

There is a way to be respectfully critical.

It does not.

By design.

And shift this writer's perception of Carter has.

Here's the segment with Jennings, from Jennings himself:

Jennings is a treasure, and he's correct.